A major new Uttlesford Transport Study, which has been finally published by UDC as part of their draft Local Plan, highlights past failings and recommends that Saffron Walden and Elsenham should be off-the-table for major new development without huge investments in new roads. The study also expresses concerns over gridlock in Great Dunmow, Newport, Stansted Mountfitchet and Takeley due to new development.
Uttlesford District Council is close to releasing its new draft Local Plan with the locations where it will put new houses over the next 16 years. UDC’s previous proposals put the majority of new development in Saffron Walden, Great Dunmow, Elsenham and Henham, but they were rejected by the Inspector in 2014; In 2016 UDC’s revised plans were withdrawn again. As UDC gets ready to reveal its new Plan it has published several key reports. These include the long-awaited Transport Study which reviews the district’s road network and looks at which places for new homes would cause the least congestion.
The Transport Study supports what local party Residents for Uttlesford and residents groups have been saying for the past 5 years – many of Uttlesford’s roads are already at or over capacity and can’t cope.
The new Transport Study finds that many roads in Saffron Walden, and all along the B1383, including in Newport, are already or will soon ‘exceed their capacity’. Source: UDC.
John Lodge continued “The study is particularly damning for UDC’s infamous eastern-link-road-to-nowhere in Saffron Walden. It is a myth and a white elephant. The study shows it will in fact actually worsen traffic and so pollution across the town. It goes on to say that no new mass housing should be proposed for Saffron Walden as the roads can’t take it, and even smaller developments will require detailed traffic and air quality assessments before they could be considered.”
Work has already started on half of the eastern link-road in Saffron Walden, even though the Transport Study makes it clear that the road is too small to do what was originally intended and will in fact make traffic worse in the town. It says only a ring-road will fix the town’s traffic (and pollution) problems.
Cllr John Lodge concluded “The study is as equally dismissive of UDC’s previous proposals for a new settlement in Elsenham and highlights concerns for the Dunmow area due to capacity issues on the A120 and M11 right from Harlow to Chesterford. There are also problems all the way along the B1383, which of course is also the relief road when there are any motorway problems. We are still waiting for the air quality study and will carefully review UDC’s draft plan when they release it in a few weeks; but after this report, we’d expect mass building in Saffron Walden and Elsenham to be off the table. We’d also expect to see solutions to the traffic problems for all the other settlements facing new developments.”
The Transport Study shows that roads in Stansted Mountfitchet, Great Dunmow, Takeley and Felsted also have problems.Source: UDC.
About Residents for Uttlesford
Residents for Uttlesford (R4U) is the local party of towns and villages. The party was formed by a number of residents’ groups in north Essex to provide a strong, independent voice for the views of the residents of the area. The party believes that on local issues locals should decide, not the Westminster party whip.
Uttlesford residents achieved substantial election gains in May 2015. Election successes were based on the group’s localism advocacy platform and the desire to create and implement long range strategic and sustainable plans for their area.
Residents for Uttlesford has 11 Uttlesford District Councillors and many Town and Parish Councillors. It is the Second Party at Uttlesford District Council and the first party at Saffron Walden Town Council.