New traffic lights and one-way scheme for London Rd and Borough Lane in Saffron Walden – R4U appalled by scheme

Residents for Uttlesford (R4U) is appalled by the latest traffic scheme by UDC and ECC that will push more traffic through Saffron Walden Town Centre because of the installation of traffic signals and a one-way system on London Road and Borough Lane.

New one-way system and traffic lights

ECC have announced their intent to undertake the next phase of UDC’s changes to Saffron Walden roads to allow more large-scale homebuilding on the east of town. The first phases of their plan introduced traffic lights at Mount Pleasant Rd and no-parking clearways across the town. Now they intend to replace the mini roundabouts at the junctions of Newport Rd and London Rd with traffic lights, and put no-entry signs to stop vehicles going up Borough Lane. The effect of this will be to send all traffic along London Rd towards the town centre, or along two-sides of a triangle up Debden Rd. However the maximum weight of articulated HGVs are 26-44t and the old railway bridge on Debden Rd is a maximum of 22t, so many HGVs will now have no option but to go through the town centre.

Same old discredited scheme

John Lodge (R4U) John Lodge (R4U)

R4U chair and district councillor John Lodge said “As part of paving the way for even more housing estates on the east of Saffron Walden, the UDC leadership, through ECC, intend to replace the mini-roundabouts at the bottom of Borough Lane with traffic lights and no-entry signs. This will force all through-traffic along London Rd towards the town centre, and make what can be already long queues even longer. A few years ago these same proposals were discredited and ridiculed. There is no evidence that this scheme is needed – it was an appalling idea then and it still is now.”

Queues, pollution and rat-runs

Cllr John Lodge continued “Not only will it create longer queues, it’ll have worse knock-on effects elsewhere. The shortest route for HGVs to crow town will be down the High St, and not along Mount Pleasant and Peaslands Roads. Not only will that route now be longer, it has a back-on-itself right turn from London Rd to Debden Rd, an uphill start at the Mount Pleasant traffic lights, followed by a left turn. Statistically HGVs are most dangerous when they turn left as they undercut cyclists and can clip pavements – and this is a busy school walking route. But Debden Rd has a 22t weight limit on the old railway bridge anyway, which limits HGV use. So this one-way system will absolutely just push more traffic through the town centre, and spike pollution that is already at illegal levels at other major junctions. Elsewhere those trying to avoid the new lights will create rat-runs of Rowntree Way to Winstanley Rd and Summer Hill Rd. It will be a mess. R4U will vigorously oppose this scheme as it is unneeded, polluting, dangerous and not in the interests of the town’s residents.”

Zero public consultation & Town Council bypassed

Cllr Lodge concluded “What is apparent is that UDC decided to ram these things through as soon as there was no longer R4U representation at County Hall. Worse still, ECC and UDC are providing no public consultation for their plans, and they’ve now changed things to prevent any veto by the town council. In cosying up to developers, they clearly decided to disregard the needs of Saffron Walden residents. Next we’ll hear that they intend to back proposals from Kier to build more homes on the east, even though they’ve been twice rejected already. What is their motivation for being so destructive to our town? They seem to have forgotten they work for us. Saffron Walden’s new county councillor can’t be silent any more. Is he going to oppose his party colleagues? It’s time for him to decide if he’s Town or Tory.”

You can send your comments to ECC and UDC

Since UDC and ECC are providing no public consultation, those concerned about the scheme may want to directly email UDC Council Leader Howard Rolfe (cllrrolfe@uttlesford.gov.uk) and Saffron Walden Essex County Councillor John Moran (cllr.john.moran@essex.gov.uk).


R4U is appalled by dangerous scheme that will push more traffic through the already polluted centre of Saffron Walden

About Residents for Uttlesford

Residents for Uttlesford (R4U) is the local party of towns and villages. The party was formed by a number of residents’ groups in north Essex to provide a strong, independent voice for the views of the residents of the area. The party believes that on local issues local residents should decide, not politicians from Westminster parties.

Uttlesford residents achieved election gains in 2013 and have been increasing their voter share ever since. In 2017 they achieved further gains with a 60% share of the vote in a local district council by-election. Election successes are based on the group’s desire to give local people a voice and implement long range strategic and sustainable plans for their area.

Residents for Uttlesford has 11 Uttlesford District Councillors and numerous Town and Parish Councillors. It is the Second Party at Uttlesford District Council and the largest party at Saffron Walden Town Council, where under its stewardship, the council has won multiple awards.

Residents for Uttlesford can be found on the web at www.residents4u.org.

13 thoughts on “New traffic lights and one-way scheme for London Rd and Borough Lane in Saffron Walden – R4U appalled by scheme

  1. Peter Wilson

    Is this some kind of sick joke? Has anyone from Essex Highways got any clue about Saffron Walden or us this ‘town planning by Google Maps” again?

    The reason we were given for removing parking in town was to encourage more traffic to use Mount Pleasant Road and Peasland Road rather than going through the town centre.

    This new looks plan looks like it’s designed to do the opppsite – making people wait twice within 100 yards and then directing them through the town centre.

    What a mess – not to mention an absolute waste of taxpayer’s money.

    Reply
    • Paul Price-Smith

      Being so close to the UDC council office entrance, I wonder whether the “bottom of Borough Lane” traffic light scheme will improve access and egress for those who work and visit there? Or make it worse?

      Reply
  2. James Tilbrook

    Being a local cab driver, this plan is totally insane, if they think this will be beneficial, they certainly need to think very hard again, it will bring total chaos!

    Reply
    • R4U Post author

      UDC & ECC have have said they are doing it. They are not planning any public consultation. After Saffron Walden Town Council opposed the yellow lines, they have now changed their process to prevent Saffron Walden Town Council from having any veto on what they do to the roads. All you can do is directly lobby UDC Leader Howard Role (he has been pushing the scheme since his head of planning left 2 years ago) and Essex Councillor John Moran. Cllr Emails are cllrrolfe@uttlesford.gov.uk and cllr.john.moran@essex.gov.uk.

      Reply
  3. Michael Pumfrey

    “ECC have announced their intent to undertake the next phase of UDC’s changes to Saffron Walden roads to allow more large-scale homebuilding on the east of town”

    Could you provide links to the ECC announcement, so that I can read it at source before responding to them?

    Reply
  4. David Tilbrook

    This is grim. If the town council has had its veto removed escalate – this to your MP. Make it clear that local issues will influence your next vote. Saffron Walden is being taken for granted because it always votes the same way.

    Reply
    • R4U Post author

      Unfortunately she’s shown so far that she is part of the system. As an identified party rising star she was parachuted in to a safe seat. She is rarely here and her family still lives in London. On every issue she has sided with her Tory party police commissioner, county and district councillors. All she would likely to say would be “these are council issues, I can’t get involved.” If we keep electing one party to all levels of government, we’ll just get the same result – a stitch up.

      Reply
  5. Jeanette Curtis

    All these changes are being made purely for more house building application I have never had a problem at Newport Road Esssex Council are trying to close down Saffron Walden with their proposals. When decisions made about local road planning we should have local representation from local shops ambulance police and fire and rescue services and locals who use the roads.
    Other countries are doing way with traffic lights as the they add to pollution and the cost of keeping them serviced and have been proved to cause more traffic congestion.

    Reply
  6. Neil Rowntree

    As far as I can see ECC has forgotten about the HGV diversion route again… Lorries coming South will not easily be able to get round the height restriction at Newport if they are more than 22 tonnes. They will either have to go up Rowntree Way or along a bendy route through town, past the RAB Leisure Centre. Am surprised no-one else seems to have spotted this. Not surprised at ECC not noticing though…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *