<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dan Starr: Only 23 councillors voted for the unsound local plan in April. How will yours vote tomorrow?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.residents4u.org/2014/12/17/dan-starr-23-councillors-voted-unsound-local-plan-april-will-vote-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2014/12/17/dan-starr-23-councillors-voted-unsound-local-plan-april-will-vote-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>Love where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:22:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff Powers		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2014/12/17/dan-starr-23-councillors-voted-unsound-local-plan-april-will-vote-tomorrow/#comment-93</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff Powers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=1446#comment-93</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The most recent comments from Cllr Rolfe which have appeared in The Dunmow Broadcast clearly give the lie to any protestation of goodwill on Mr Rolfe&#039;s part towards opposition members and residents&#039; groups: the council has decided on its next moves - to forge ahead by &#039;tweaking&#039; and building on the rejected DLP.  So the council&#039;s strategy for addressing the Planning Inspector&#039;s objections will not be the subject of debate with the council opposition groups and residents.  I think that Cllr Rolfe&#039;s statement of intent will render it well nigh impossible for any meaningful engagement with those opposed to the DLP to take place. It seems participation will be on Rolfe&#039;s terms or not at all.  Has the council leadership completely lost the ability to comprehend plain English and take in what the inspector has actually said?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most recent comments from Cllr Rolfe which have appeared in The Dunmow Broadcast clearly give the lie to any protestation of goodwill on Mr Rolfe&#8217;s part towards opposition members and residents&#8217; groups: the council has decided on its next moves &#8211; to forge ahead by &#8216;tweaking&#8217; and building on the rejected DLP.  So the council&#8217;s strategy for addressing the Planning Inspector&#8217;s objections will not be the subject of debate with the council opposition groups and residents.  I think that Cllr Rolfe&#8217;s statement of intent will render it well nigh impossible for any meaningful engagement with those opposed to the DLP to take place. It seems participation will be on Rolfe&#8217;s terms or not at all.  Has the council leadership completely lost the ability to comprehend plain English and take in what the inspector has actually said?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
