<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: R4U are having a real effect in planning for the future.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.residents4u.org/2015/10/05/r4u-are-having-a-real-effect-in-planning-for-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2015/10/05/r4u-are-having-a-real-effect-in-planning-for-the-future/</link>
	<description>Love where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff Powers		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2015/10/05/r4u-are-having-a-real-effect-in-planning-for-the-future/#comment-423</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff Powers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=6274#comment-423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John

I can&#039;t quibble with your declaration of openness - and patently, ensuring developers keep their noses out of the process is just how it should be - and I am encouraged by the new arrangements for public participation, which all will agree are very positive.  I am much more concerned about the continuing propensity of some of the &#039;duff&#039; Tory councillors* we still have around to make idiotic decisions if for no better reason than that after 8 years they really do not seem to comprehend what the process is all about.  

The council is clearly being pointed towards a single-settlement solution.  Once that decision is made in principle - a decision the council surely cannot now avoid - what price evidence-led planning?  Will it become &#039;cats in a sack&#039; time once again?  We have to have to ensure that everyone involved in the process is repeating the mantra: &#039;Planning is not a political process!&#039;  

(* I will refrain from identifying them by name!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t quibble with your declaration of openness &#8211; and patently, ensuring developers keep their noses out of the process is just how it should be &#8211; and I am encouraged by the new arrangements for public participation, which all will agree are very positive.  I am much more concerned about the continuing propensity of some of the &#8216;duff&#8217; Tory councillors* we still have around to make idiotic decisions if for no better reason than that after 8 years they really do not seem to comprehend what the process is all about.  </p>
<p>The council is clearly being pointed towards a single-settlement solution.  Once that decision is made in principle &#8211; a decision the council surely cannot now avoid &#8211; what price evidence-led planning?  Will it become &#8216;cats in a sack&#8217; time once again?  We have to have to ensure that everyone involved in the process is repeating the mantra: &#8216;Planning is not a political process!&#8217;  </p>
<p>(* I will refrain from identifying them by name!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
