https://www.residents4u.org/2016/09/28/udc-leader-refuses-answer-simple-question-less-1-new-homes-proposed-udc-cabinet-lives/ Love where you live Fri, 03 Mar 2017 12:21:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://www.residents4u.org/2016/09/28/udc-leader-refuses-answer-simple-question-less-1-new-homes-proposed-udc-cabinet-lives/#comment-501 Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:14:51 +0000 http://www.residents4u.org/?p=8627#comment-501 There is a similar avoidance to answer why Uttlesford must take one of the highest percentage housing growths of any district in the country (recent letters in the Local). Two accountants have examined the consultants report supplying the figures, which underpin the whole Plan. They could could find neither explanation nor full audit trail. I raised this with the new UDC Head of Planning and he could not explain. Howard Rolfe’s response in print and email is that the consultants are experts and a Planning Inspector thought it was OK. Which does not answer the question. I don’t know why it is large and it seems no one else does either. There is no exact right or wrong answer, but it would be a good idea to have a convincing explanation ready for the Plan Inspector

]]>