<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Resident voices finally heard at Local Plan meeting, but Tories reject total transparency vote &#8211; Press Release	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.residents4u.org/2016/11/20/resident-voices-finally-heard-local-plan-meeting-tories-reject-total-transparency-vote-press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2016/11/20/resident-voices-finally-heard-local-plan-meeting-tories-reject-total-transparency-vote-press-release/</link>
	<description>Love where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 11:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2016/11/20/resident-voices-finally-heard-local-plan-meeting-tories-reject-total-transparency-vote-press-release/#comment-1622</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 11:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=8832#comment-1622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2016/11/20/resident-voices-finally-heard-local-plan-meeting-tories-reject-total-transparency-vote-press-release/#comment-1621&quot;&gt;Jennifer Capon&lt;/a&gt;.

An interesting article Jennifer. Thanks. We’ve heard similar stories about many of the larger developments in Uttlesford by large national building companies. The current UDC administration has been saying that they may hand over the role of ‘master developer’ of new towns to these companies. It seems that many of them can’t build quality homes, let alone communities. We have a different approach which is that any new towns should be steered by community led local Development Corporations. You can find out more here: https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2016/11/20/resident-voices-finally-heard-local-plan-meeting-tories-reject-total-transparency-vote-press-release/#comment-1621">Jennifer Capon</a>.</p>
<p>An interesting article Jennifer. Thanks. We’ve heard similar stories about many of the larger developments in Uttlesford by large national building companies. The current UDC administration has been saying that they may hand over the role of ‘master developer’ of new towns to these companies. It seems that many of them can’t build quality homes, let alone communities. We have a different approach which is that any new towns should be steered by community led local Development Corporations. You can find out more here: <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/" rel="ugc">https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer Capon		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2016/11/20/resident-voices-finally-heard-local-plan-meeting-tories-reject-total-transparency-vote-press-release/#comment-1621</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Capon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=8832#comment-1621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting article on BBC website re new builds. I&#039;m wondering how closely Uttlesford (truly) manages the quality of proposed building. It looks as if, statistically, there could be a large number of problems in a town-sized project.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47826166]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article on BBC website re new builds. I&#8217;m wondering how closely Uttlesford (truly) manages the quality of proposed building. It looks as if, statistically, there could be a large number of problems in a town-sized project.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47826166" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47826166</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
