<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 94 houses go ahead in Newport after planning appeal lost – and another 150 proposed, so reply to consultation while you can	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.residents4u.org/2017/10/31/94-houses-go-ahead-in-newport-after-planning-appeal-lost-and-another-150-proposed-so-reply-to-consultation-while-you-can/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/10/31/94-houses-go-ahead-in-newport-after-planning-appeal-lost-and-another-150-proposed-so-reply-to-consultation-while-you-can/</link>
	<description>Love where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Neil Hargreaves		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/10/31/94-houses-go-ahead-in-newport-after-planning-appeal-lost-and-another-150-proposed-so-reply-to-consultation-while-you-can/#comment-701</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Hargreaves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10009#comment-701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes!
If you would like to send these comments to planning@uttlesford.gov.uk quoting UTT/17/2868/OP, that would be helpfull!  The peak time congestion is a key factor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!<br />
If you would like to send these comments to <a href="mailto:planning@uttlesford.gov.uk">planning@uttlesford.gov.uk</a> quoting UTT/17/2868/OP, that would be helpfull!  The peak time congestion is a key factor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: g gibbs		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/10/31/94-houses-go-ahead-in-newport-after-planning-appeal-lost-and-another-150-proposed-so-reply-to-consultation-while-you-can/#comment-700</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[g gibbs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10009#comment-700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is ridiculous, White ditch Lane has 150 houses granted, down a narrow single track lane which is a dead end. There is no mains drainage down there and on a hot day parts of the lane stink, it will become a congested smelly little no go area. Newport is already developing along the main round towards Saffron Walden to the detriment of the country side and the road. Huge areas of housing have been allowed around the school and further up Water Bury Lane towards the M11, which makes the little lanes very congested especially at school time. To build more in Newport is just geed on the part of developers and those selling the land.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous, White ditch Lane has 150 houses granted, down a narrow single track lane which is a dead end. There is no mains drainage down there and on a hot day parts of the lane stink, it will become a congested smelly little no go area. Newport is already developing along the main round towards Saffron Walden to the detriment of the country side and the road. Huge areas of housing have been allowed around the school and further up Water Bury Lane towards the M11, which makes the little lanes very congested especially at school time. To build more in Newport is just geed on the part of developers and those selling the land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrea Reynolds		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/10/31/94-houses-go-ahead-in-newport-after-planning-appeal-lost-and-another-150-proposed-so-reply-to-consultation-while-you-can/#comment-699</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea Reynolds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 18:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10009#comment-699</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is outrageous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is outrageous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
