<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 4 ways to put Uttlesford residents in the driving seat of new settlements	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/</link>
	<description>Love where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-708</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 18:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10050#comment-708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-707&quot;&gt;Richard Ansell&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you Richard, we just had someone email us the letter 10 minutes ago. Scope creep was our concern with UDC granting Ridgeons development permission for the whole site. It is clearly worrying as there is so much development going in on the east of Saffron Walden without UDC having any plan for infrastructure. We’ll put a team on it to look into it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-707">Richard Ansell</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you Richard, we just had someone email us the letter 10 minutes ago. Scope creep was our concern with UDC granting Ridgeons development permission for the whole site. It is clearly worrying as there is so much development going in on the east of Saffron Walden without UDC having any plan for infrastructure. We’ll put a team on it to look into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Ansell		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-707</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Ansell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 18:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10050#comment-707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-702&quot;&gt;Richard Ansell&lt;/a&gt;.

Turnstone estates Ltd they have submitted  planning application to uttlesford district council for 55 more houses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-702">Richard Ansell</a>.</p>
<p>Turnstone estates Ltd they have submitted  planning application to uttlesford district council for 55 more houses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 17:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10050#comment-706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-704&quot;&gt;Richard Ansell&lt;/a&gt;.

BTW we can’t find any record of an additional 60 homes by Bloor on Ashdon Rd (we assume you mean on the Ridgeons’ site). There doesn’t seem to be anything in the UDC planning system. Do you have any more details or a planning application number?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-704">Richard Ansell</a>.</p>
<p>BTW we can’t find any record of an additional 60 homes by Bloor on Ashdon Rd (we assume you mean on the Ridgeons’ site). There doesn’t seem to be anything in the UDC planning system. Do you have any more details or a planning application number?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 17:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10050#comment-705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-704&quot;&gt;Richard Ansell&lt;/a&gt;.

R4U is the second biggest party at UDC. The Conservatives are the biggest party and so control all the committees and decisions. However we have 3 seats (which is 30%) on the Planning Committee. That allows us to make sure that issues are aired with respect to planning matters, but we can be outvoted when the Conservatives are whipped. We also have 2 seats on the Local Plan working group, where we can again try to make sure the right things are done. If we were elected to run the Council in 2019 we could change things about and make decisions with and for residents. But today as the second party, our role is to hold to account, expose where things are not being done right, support things that are being done right, and try to nudge policy decisions so that they align with our residents focused agenda. The key difference between us and Westminster parties, is that ultimately Westminster politicians work for their parties, not those that elected them. R4U was formed because people were tired of being ignored by local politicians of Westminster parties. We only have one boss, residents. They way to get a proper residents’’ agenda is to elect us to run UDC in 2019.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-704">Richard Ansell</a>.</p>
<p>R4U is the second biggest party at UDC. The Conservatives are the biggest party and so control all the committees and decisions. However we have 3 seats (which is 30%) on the Planning Committee. That allows us to make sure that issues are aired with respect to planning matters, but we can be outvoted when the Conservatives are whipped. We also have 2 seats on the Local Plan working group, where we can again try to make sure the right things are done. If we were elected to run the Council in 2019 we could change things about and make decisions with and for residents. But today as the second party, our role is to hold to account, expose where things are not being done right, support things that are being done right, and try to nudge policy decisions so that they align with our residents focused agenda. The key difference between us and Westminster parties, is that ultimately Westminster politicians work for their parties, not those that elected them. R4U was formed because people were tired of being ignored by local politicians of Westminster parties. We only have one boss, residents. They way to get a proper residents’’ agenda is to elect us to run UDC in 2019.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Ansell		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-704</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Ansell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10050#comment-704</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Really so what do you do for us surely you have some say in planning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really so what do you do for us surely you have some say in planning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10050#comment-703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-702&quot;&gt;Richard Ansell&lt;/a&gt;.

R4U agrees with you. Saffron Walden needs more infrastructure (roads, schools, etc.) before more homes are allowed and there needs to be a specific allocation of the ‘so called’ affordable home just for local people.  Those are 2 of the things we’d like to see UDC adopt … BUT we don’t control UDC. It is a Tory run administration. They decide where the new homes get built and what to ask developers to cough up for. We think the Tory administration is doing a poor job of looking out for residents and their needs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-702">Richard Ansell</a>.</p>
<p>R4U agrees with you. Saffron Walden needs more infrastructure (roads, schools, etc.) before more homes are allowed and there needs to be a specific allocation of the ‘so called’ affordable home just for local people.  Those are 2 of the things we’d like to see UDC adopt … BUT we don’t control UDC. It is a Tory run administration. They decide where the new homes get built and what to ask developers to cough up for. We think the Tory administration is doing a poor job of looking out for residents and their needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Ansell		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2017/11/14/4-ways-to-put-uttlesford-residents-in-the-driving-seat-of-new-settlements/#comment-702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Ansell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10050#comment-702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ref Ashdon Road development.Further to Bloom homes development there is now an application for 60 more  plus more houses .This is ridiculous as the Ashdon Rd cannot take anymore traffic it is congested as it is there is no way this is viable .Mainly roads schools doctors and dentists . So are residents 4 UK going to construct a school plus put in a bypass before this is allowed .Having lived in Saffron Walden nearly all my life I feel that the town is dying and these houseservices are not going to be affordable for local people .Example my son and wife couldn&#039;t afford a house in town they bought a house in Haverhill . When are you going to look at the situation of first time buyers going to be able to buy houses in the town they grew up in ,or do you want the town to full of older people .There seems to be no problem for retirement homes /glass to be built .But no affordable or social housing being built .Come look at you public before you give the go ahead for any future developments .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ref Ashdon Road development.Further to Bloom homes development there is now an application for 60 more  plus more houses .This is ridiculous as the Ashdon Rd cannot take anymore traffic it is congested as it is there is no way this is viable .Mainly roads schools doctors and dentists . So are residents 4 UK going to construct a school plus put in a bypass before this is allowed .Having lived in Saffron Walden nearly all my life I feel that the town is dying and these houseservices are not going to be affordable for local people .Example my son and wife couldn&#8217;t afford a house in town they bought a house in Haverhill . When are you going to look at the situation of first time buyers going to be able to buy houses in the town they grew up in ,or do you want the town to full of older people .There seems to be no problem for retirement homes /glass to be built .But no affordable or social housing being built .Come look at you public before you give the go ahead for any future developments .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
