<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New traffic lights and one-way scheme for London Rd and Borough Lane in Saffron Walden &#8211; R4U appalled by scheme	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/</link>
	<description>Love where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Neil Rowntree		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Rowntree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 20:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As far as I can see ECC has forgotten about the HGV diversion route again... Lorries coming South will not easily be able to get round the height restriction at Newport if they are more than 22 tonnes. They will either have to go up Rowntree Way or along a bendy route through town, past the RAB Leisure Centre. Am surprised no-one else seems to have spotted this. Not surprised at ECC not noticing though...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can see ECC has forgotten about the HGV diversion route again&#8230; Lorries coming South will not easily be able to get round the height restriction at Newport if they are more than 22 tonnes. They will either have to go up Rowntree Way or along a bendy route through town, past the RAB Leisure Centre. Am surprised no-one else seems to have spotted this. Not surprised at ECC not noticing though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-725&quot;&gt;Jeanette Curtis&lt;/a&gt;.

You are 100% correct.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-725">Jeanette Curtis</a>.</p>
<p>You are 100% correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeanette Curtis		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeanette Curtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All these changes are being made purely for more house building application I have never had a problem at Newport Road Esssex Council are trying to close down Saffron Walden with their proposals. When decisions made about local road planning we should have local representation from local shops ambulance police and fire and rescue services and locals who use the roads. 
Other countries are doing way with traffic lights as the they add to pollution and the cost of keeping them serviced and have been proved to cause more traffic congestion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these changes are being made purely for more house building application I have never had a problem at Newport Road Esssex Council are trying to close down Saffron Walden with their proposals. When decisions made about local road planning we should have local representation from local shops ambulance police and fire and rescue services and locals who use the roads.<br />
Other countries are doing way with traffic lights as the they add to pollution and the cost of keeping them serviced and have been proved to cause more traffic congestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-723&quot;&gt;David Tilbrook&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately she’s shown so far that she is part of the system. As an identified party rising star she was parachuted in to a safe seat. She is rarely here and her family still lives in London. On every issue she has sided with her Tory party police commissioner, county and district councillors. All she would likely to say would be “these are council issues, I can’t get involved.” If we keep electing one party to all levels of government, we’ll just get the same result – a stitch up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-723">David Tilbrook</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately she’s shown so far that she is part of the system. As an identified party rising star she was parachuted in to a safe seat. She is rarely here and her family still lives in London. On every issue she has sided with her Tory party police commissioner, county and district councillors. All she would likely to say would be “these are council issues, I can’t get involved.” If we keep electing one party to all levels of government, we’ll just get the same result – a stitch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Tilbrook		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Tilbrook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is grim. If the town council has had its veto removed escalate - this to your MP. Make it clear that local issues will influence your next vote. Saffron Walden is being taken for granted because it always votes the same way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is grim. If the town council has had its veto removed escalate &#8211; this to your MP. Make it clear that local issues will influence your next vote. Saffron Walden is being taken for granted because it always votes the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-722</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-721&quot;&gt;Michael Pumfrey&lt;/a&gt;.

Michael - ECC announcement was via an email they sent to Saffron Walden Town Council. All is said was that they wanted feedback and attached the drawing that we have linked on the page above. There was no explanation or supporting documentation. Their document is here: http://www.residents4u.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Option-3-2xSignals-V7.pdf]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-721">Michael Pumfrey</a>.</p>
<p>Michael &#8211; ECC announcement was via an email they sent to Saffron Walden Town Council. All is said was that they wanted feedback and attached the drawing that we have linked on the page above. There was no explanation or supporting documentation. Their document is here: <a href="http://www.residents4u.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Option-3-2xSignals-V7.pdf" rel="ugc">http://www.residents4u.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Option-3-2xSignals-V7.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Pumfrey		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-721</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Pumfrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;ECC have announced their intent to undertake the next phase of UDC’s changes to Saffron Walden roads to allow more large-scale homebuilding on the east of town&quot;

Could you provide links to the ECC announcement, so that I can read it at source before responding to them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ECC have announced their intent to undertake the next phase of UDC’s changes to Saffron Walden roads to allow more large-scale homebuilding on the east of town&#8221;</p>
<p>Could you provide links to the ECC announcement, so that I can read it at source before responding to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Tilbrook		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Tilbrook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 19:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mmmm Paul that is a hard one! Should we say worse!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmm Paul that is a hard one! Should we say worse!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul Price-Smith		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-718</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Price-Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-714&quot;&gt;Peter Wilson&lt;/a&gt;.

Being so close to the UDC council office entrance, I wonder whether the “bottom of Borough Lane” traffic light scheme will improve access and egress for those who work and visit there? Or make it worse?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-714">Peter Wilson</a>.</p>
<p>Being so close to the UDC council office entrance, I wonder whether the “bottom of Borough Lane” traffic light scheme will improve access and egress for those who work and visit there? Or make it worse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R4U		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-717</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10198#comment-717</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-716&quot;&gt;James Tilbrook&lt;/a&gt;.

UDC &amp; ECC have have said they are doing it. They are not planning any public consultation. After Saffron Walden Town Council opposed the yellow lines, they have now changed their process to prevent Saffron Walden Town Council from having any veto on what they do to the roads. All you can do is directly lobby UDC Leader Howard Role (he has been pushing the scheme since his head of planning left 2 years ago) and Essex Councillor John Moran. Cllr Emails are cllrrolfe@uttlesford.gov.uk and cllr.john.moran@essex.gov.uk.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/16/new-traffic-lights-and-one-way-street-for-london-rd-and-borough-lane-in-saffron-walden-r4u-appalled-by-scheme/#comment-716">James Tilbrook</a>.</p>
<p>UDC &#038; ECC have have said they are doing it. They are not planning any public consultation. After Saffron Walden Town Council opposed the yellow lines, they have now changed their process to prevent Saffron Walden Town Council from having any veto on what they do to the roads. All you can do is directly lobby UDC Leader Howard Role (he has been pushing the scheme since his head of planning left 2 years ago) and Essex Councillor John Moran. Cllr Emails are <a href="mailto:cllrrolfe@uttlesford.gov.uk">cllrrolfe@uttlesford.gov.uk</a> and <a href="mailto:cllr.john.moran@essex.gov.uk">cllr.john.moran@essex.gov.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
