<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Objection submitted to voice residents’ concerns about new Saffron Walden traffic light and one-way scheme	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/24/objection-submitted-to-voice-residents-concerns-about-new-saffron-walden-traffic-light-and-one-way-scheme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/24/objection-submitted-to-voice-residents-concerns-about-new-saffron-walden-traffic-light-and-one-way-scheme/</link>
	<description>Love where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sandra lloyd		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/24/objection-submitted-to-voice-residents-concerns-about-new-saffron-walden-traffic-light-and-one-way-scheme/#comment-728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sandra lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10236#comment-728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[it’s s great shame there doesn’t appear to be strategists in the long term planning process. thousands more houses in uttlesford but no sensible road or transport system that links them. thaxted as well as saffron walden suffering.  where are the roads, rail, transport plans.  tinkering with the current system is not the answer. i hope R4U can manage to raise this at the highest level. thanks for your efforts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it’s s great shame there doesn’t appear to be strategists in the long term planning process. thousands more houses in uttlesford but no sensible road or transport system that links them. thaxted as well as saffron walden suffering.  where are the roads, rail, transport plans.  tinkering with the current system is not the answer. i hope R4U can manage to raise this at the highest level. thanks for your efforts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rod Brister		</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/01/24/objection-submitted-to-voice-residents-concerns-about-new-saffron-walden-traffic-light-and-one-way-scheme/#comment-727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod Brister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10236#comment-727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lets face it there isn&#039;t a good route through Saffron Walden for HGV&#039;s it&#039;s an old Market Town designed around horses and carts and I can&#039;t for the life of me see what this new scheme is supposed to achieve.  From my observations very few HGV&#039;s use the signed route anyway most seem to go through the town. I certainly would not like to take an artic up Borough Lane. I will never understand why South Road is not one way for it&#039;s entire length either.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets face it there isn&#8217;t a good route through Saffron Walden for HGV&#8217;s it&#8217;s an old Market Town designed around horses and carts and I can&#8217;t for the life of me see what this new scheme is supposed to achieve.  From my observations very few HGV&#8217;s use the signed route anyway most seem to go through the town. I certainly would not like to take an artic up Borough Lane. I will never understand why South Road is not one way for it&#8217;s entire length either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
