<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Residents for Uttlesford [R4U] Kier Archives - Residents for Uttlesford</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.residents4u.org/tag/kier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.residents4u.org/tag/kier/</link>
	<description>Love where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">70608645</site>	<item>
		<title>Significant concerns UDC massaged pollution report for Saffron Walden ahead of key vote on additional 250 house estates east of town</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/12/13/significant-concerns-udc-massaged-pollution-report-for-saffron-walden-ahead-of-key-vote-on-additional-250-house-estates-east-of-town/</link>
					<comments>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/12/13/significant-concerns-udc-massaged-pollution-report-for-saffron-walden-ahead-of-key-vote-on-additional-250-house-estates-east-of-town/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttlesford District Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=11184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Major concerns have been voiced by Residents for Uttlesford about a new air quality report that Uttlesford District Council has produced to support building at least a further 250 houses <a class="more-link" href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/12/13/significant-concerns-udc-massaged-pollution-report-for-saffron-walden-ahead-of-key-vote-on-additional-250-house-estates-east-of-town/">...read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/12/13/significant-concerns-udc-massaged-pollution-report-for-saffron-walden-ahead-of-key-vote-on-additional-250-house-estates-east-of-town/">Significant concerns UDC massaged pollution report for Saffron Walden ahead of key vote on additional 250 house estates east of town</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.residents4u.org">Residents for Uttlesford</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/12/13/significant-concerns-udc-massaged-pollution-report-for-saffron-walden-ahead-of-key-vote-on-additional-250-house-estates-east-of-town/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11184</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UDC again fails to make developers pay as Saffron Walden misses out on £1millon in sports &#038; leisure facilities</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/10/01/udc-again-fails-to-make-developers-pay-as-saffron-walden-misses-out-on-1millon-in-sports-leisure-facilities/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4U]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 18:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open spaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saffron Walden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Uttlesford District Council has failed to ask a developer for any contribution towards community sports or other leisure facilities, and that as a direct result Saffron Walden residents have seen <a class="more-link" href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/10/01/udc-again-fails-to-make-developers-pay-as-saffron-walden-misses-out-on-1millon-in-sports-leisure-facilities/">...read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/10/01/udc-again-fails-to-make-developers-pay-as-saffron-walden-misses-out-on-1millon-in-sports-leisure-facilities/">UDC again fails to make developers pay as Saffron Walden misses out on £1millon in sports &#038; leisure facilities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.residents4u.org">Residents for Uttlesford</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10833</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Significant concerns about bias at UDC towards planning approvals sought by Kier in Saffron Walden</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2018/04/22/significant-concerns-about-bias-at-udc-towards-planning-approvals-sought-by-kier-in-saffron-walden/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Press Release]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttlesford District Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saffron Walden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=10336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Major concerns have been expressed about a new planning application by Kier to build 150 homes on the east of Saffron Walden, and also that Uttlesford District Council has shown <a class="more-link" href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/04/22/significant-concerns-about-bias-at-udc-towards-planning-approvals-sought-by-kier-in-saffron-walden/">...read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2018/04/22/significant-concerns-about-bias-at-udc-towards-planning-approvals-sought-by-kier-in-saffron-walden/">Significant concerns about bias at UDC towards planning approvals sought by Kier in Saffron Walden</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.residents4u.org">Residents for Uttlesford</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10336</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uttlesford parents have no choice in state education provider and forced to pay thousands for transport.</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2016/08/12/8509/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lodge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents for Essex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cllr Ray Gooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essex County Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fare increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard working families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manor Oak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R4U]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDC: Current Councillors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westminster]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=8509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Essex County Council’s performance on education in the north of the district continues to deteriorate. Whilst schools are providing outstanding education, ECC &#8216;s support to hard working parents is declining. <a class="more-link" href="https://www.residents4u.org/2016/08/12/8509/">...read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2016/08/12/8509/">Uttlesford parents have no choice in state education provider and forced to pay thousands for transport.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.residents4u.org">Residents for Uttlesford</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8509</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A &#8216;Hub&#8217; at what cost?</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2015/10/01/a-hub-at-what-cost/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lodge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kier Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leisure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saffron Walden]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=6212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We should not think that the pollution troubles of Volkswagen are a long way removed from life in Saffron Walden and I was made acutely aware of this by the <a class="more-link" href="https://www.residents4u.org/2015/10/01/a-hub-at-what-cost/">...read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2015/10/01/a-hub-at-what-cost/">A &#8216;Hub&#8217; at what cost?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.residents4u.org">Residents for Uttlesford</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6212</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Release: Residents’ victory as 300-home planning appeal dismissed due to unsustainable traffic impacts to Saffron Walden</title>
		<link>https://www.residents4u.org/2015/06/02/press-release-residents-victory-as-300-home-planning-appeal-dismissed-due-to-unsustainable-traffic-impacts-to-saffron-walden/</link>
					<comments>https://www.residents4u.org/2015/06/02/press-release-residents-victory-as-300-home-planning-appeal-dismissed-due-to-unsustainable-traffic-impacts-to-saffron-walden/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Press Release]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 17:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kier Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parish: Saffron Walden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saffron Walden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saffron Walden Town Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDC: Current Councillors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttlesford Local Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ward: Saffron Walden Shire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residents4u.org/?p=5528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2 June 2015, Uttlesford: Residents for Uttlesford (R4U), the local advocacy group for towns and villages, has hailed the Planning Inspector’s decision to refuse the building of 300 new houses <a class="more-link" href="https://www.residents4u.org/2015/06/02/press-release-residents-victory-as-300-home-planning-appeal-dismissed-due-to-unsustainable-traffic-impacts-to-saffron-walden/">...read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.residents4u.org/2015/06/02/press-release-residents-victory-as-300-home-planning-appeal-dismissed-due-to-unsustainable-traffic-impacts-to-saffron-walden/">Press Release: Residents’ victory as 300-home planning appeal dismissed due to unsustainable traffic impacts to Saffron Walden</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.residents4u.org">Residents for Uttlesford</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.residents4u.org/2015/06/02/press-release-residents-victory-as-300-home-planning-appeal-dismissed-due-to-unsustainable-traffic-impacts-to-saffron-walden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5528</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
