400 proposed jobs at risk in Saffron Walden due to new Ridgeons’ housing proposal

There are local concerns that 400 proposed new local Saffron Walden jobs will be lost if Ridgeons is allowed to renege on its agreement to deliver new employment land and instead build more houses.

Heather Asker (R4U) Heather Asker (R4U)

R4U ward councillor Heather Asker said “More than three years ago when UDC granted planning permission for Ridgeons to build houses on half of their Saffron Walden site, it was part of a combined development commitment that would bring more than 400 local jobs to the town on the rest of the site. By doing an about face and wanting to flip half of the remaining site to houses, they will make many £millions more in profit, but at the expense of 400 local people who won’t get work. These jobs are important as other employment sites have been turned to houses and Pulse/Printpack on Radwinter Rd recently folded.”

Cllr Asker continued “There is also the issue of traffic. Ridgeons’ planning consultants have said that they don’t need to do any new traffic and pollution studies because they don’t believe that new houses will generate more traffic than if the land was used for jobs. This isn’t true. Because there are fewer jobs in the town, new homeowners would need to commute through the town to get to work elsewhere, and anyway the traffic in the town has changed over the last 4 years due to many other new housing estates. In fact ECC has made it clear that Saffron Walden now can’t take any more houses on the east without a relief road, and none is proposed.”

Cllr Asker concluded “What this goes to show is that developers can’t be trusted to deliver what they said they would. And the current legal mechanism that UDC uses, called Section 106 agreements, can’t force them to either, as we’ve see all over Uttlesford in the past. UDC should be forcing all larger new developments to be delivered via community controlled Development Corporations, which put local people in the driving seat and stop developers trying to pull a fast one. Residents expect UDC to fully and properly scrutinise this proposal from Ridgeons and hold them to their original commitment to provide an employment site for 400 new local jobs.”

Respond to Public Consultation

UDC indicate that the Latest Advertisement Expiry Date for public consultation is 18th January 2018, so concerned residents should get their responses in quickly. The planning application number is UTT/17/3413/OP. Comments can be emailed to UDC at planning@uttlesford.gov.uk quoting the planning application number, or made directly on the UDC website here.

About Residents for Uttlesford

Residents for Uttlesford (R4U) is the local party of towns and villages. The party was formed by a number of residents’ groups in north Essex to provide a strong, independent voice for the views of the residents of the area. The party believes that on local issues local residents should decide, not politicians from Westminster parties.

Uttlesford residents achieved election gains in 2013 and have been increasing their voter share ever since. In 2017 they achieved further gains with a 60% share of the vote in a local district council by-election. Election successes are based on the group’s desire to give local people a voice and implement long range strategic and sustainable plans for their area.

Residents for Uttlesford has 11 Uttlesford District Councillors and numerous Town and Parish Councillors. It is the Second Party at Uttlesford District Council and the largest party at Saffron Walden Town Council, where under its stewardship, the council has won multiple awards.

Residents for Uttlesford can be found on the web at www.residents4u.org.

One thought on “400 proposed jobs at risk in Saffron Walden due to new Ridgeons’ housing proposal

  1. Steve

    I was told in June 2017 that there would be no hotel or other facilities just houses. One of the guys working the site as a supervisor was talking to others whilst off the site and was asked about a hotel going up, he said that there was no intent to build anything except houses as the money is in houses. Guess he knew already. Also heard a person from Ridgeons say the same about a week earlier. Shocking that if this was agreed up front in planning and was agreed as part of the plan that any consideration would be given to change what was agreed, that area of land should be held as commercial and if no takers can be found then the land is just held until one does. It should never be released as housing. Councillors and planning dept should be held responsible for this otherswise same thing will happen time and time again. It’s not acceptable!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.