Our History

The roots of R4U go back to 2011 and the formation of a number of independent and unconnected residents’ groups. Over the following 2 years a number of the residents groups met and agreed how they could best work together to represent communities across Uttlesford district. These groups connected under the clouds of a failing district Local Plan where decisions on new housing were being made for non-transparent reasons rather than following the evidence for where were the best locations.

At the time the Conservative draft Local Plan proposed a new settlement at Elsenham and Henham and the rest of the housing dispersed around the existing towns of Saffron Walden and Great Dunmow, and a number of villages in the district. There was almost nothing proposed in the way of new infrastructure, such as roads and schools. The groups were unhappy with this situation because public opinion, housing need and evidence were being ignored.

Nov 2013: Residents Coalition Pressure Group

In 2013 the residents groups formed a coalition under the banner of Uttlesford United Residents. The coalition included residents groups and parish council representatives from Elsenham, Henham, Newport, Saffron Walden, Stansted Mountfitchet & Takeley.

Uttlesford United Residents: a coalition of residents groups and parish council representatives from Elsenham, Henham, Newport, Saffron Walden, Stansted Mountfitchet & Takeley.

Uttlesford United Residents: a coalition of residents groups and parish council representatives from Elsenham, Henham, Newport, Saffron Walden, Stansted Mountfitchet & Takeley.

The residents’ coalition agreed a series of united aims:

  1. The Local Plan development process be stopped and the current draft plan discarded.
  2. A brand new Local Plan development process to be put in place that meets the following standards:
    • It is strategic: it works to an agreed set of objectives and reviews options against these objectives. It takes account of existing infrastructure capacity and needs as well as the infrastructure requirements that accompany new households before deciding where to put houses.
    • It is evidence-based: up-to-date evidence is gathered first before decisions are taken.
    • It is open and transparent: information is provided in a timely and accessible manner to stakeholders. That all decisions and discussions related to the local plan are open to public scrutiny.
    • It includes early and meaningful engagement with local organisations and parish/town councils and that concerns and ideas of individuals and organisations in Uttlesford are properly considered.
    • It is timely: that a robust time-frame for development of the plan is put in place and accountability for meeting the time-frame established.

Oct 2014: Residents Party

Unsatisfied that the leadership at Uttlesford District Council still refused to follow an evidence-based process, in the Autumn of 2014 a number of those residents groups formed a political party, Residents for Uttlesford (R4U). R4U had the intent to carry forward the aims of the coalition by changing the system from the inside, whilst the remaining residents’ groups continued to apply pressure from the outside.

Inspiration for the party was taken from other successful local independent parties in the UK, including the Loughton Residents Association elsewhere in Essex, Independents for Frome with their Flatpack Democracy model, and Residents Associations of Epsom and Ewell.

The residents’ coalition and R4U continued to apply pressure on what they considered was a flawed Local Plan by Uttlesford District Council. They were eventually found to be correct when the Local Plan was rejected by the Planning Inspectorate in December 2014.

May 2015: Election Success

For the 2015 local elections R4U produced the first local manifesto that had ever been produced for Uttlesford. This encompassed the goals of the residents’ coalition together with well-rounded policies that covered all the major topics, including the economy, schools, roads, environment, health and community.

R4U achieved remarkable electoral success for a new party. After the May 2015 election, R4U had councillors at all levels of local government, county, district, town and parish, from Dunmow to Saffron Walden, and was the second party at Uttlesford District Council.

Growth and Maturity

Since the 2015 local elections R4U continued to champion residents’ causes. It helped new resident groups to get off the ground, such as in Thaxted. It has also maintained and expanded its alliances with the founding members of the original residents’ coalition, including Save Our Villages in Henham.

Where it is the first party at a council, such as at Saffron Walden Town Council, it has fixed a £1m financial hole left by previous administrations and repaired crumbling community assets. On other councils, such as in Great Dunmow, it has been working to create a more vibrant town centre economy. A number of places it’s councillors are working on the development of Neighbourhood Plans.

On Uttlesford District Council where it is the second party, it has continued to push the Conservative leadership to do a proper job. In late 2016 continued pressure forced the UDC leadership to withdraw another failing Local Plan and go back to the drawing board – this time following an evidence-led process.

In 2017 R4U contested a by-election in the Elsenham and Henham ward where it captured 60% of the vote and gained 2 additional seats at the district council.

May 2019: Gain Control of Uttlesford District Council

In the May 2019 local elections R4U gained control of the local planning authority, Uttlesford District Council. It inflicted the greatest Conservative loss of seats (-83%) in any district council where they held a majority. R4U gained 26 seats, reducing the Conservatives to a minority party of 4.

A Future Built Around Residents

R4U continues to champion residents’ causes, make their voices heard, and is working to deliver better, more transparent local councils. See what we are working to deliver for residents by reading our policies.