R4U has called on the respective Secretaries of State and local MP Kemi Badenoch for a Public Inquiry into the proposed expansion of Stansted Airport by the Manchester Airports Group (MAG).
Manchester Airports Group (MAG), who own and operate Stansted Airport, has submitted a planning application to Uttlesford District Council to expand the airport capacity to more than 43 million passengers a year. If this new application was approved it would more than double passenger numbers from the 18 million a year that used the airport when MAG took it over in 2013. By comparison last year 78 million passengers used Heathrow and 45.6 million Gatwick, both of which currently have 2 runways.
“The fact that UDC is expected to make the decision is highly concerning. The existing Stansted to London railway is already overloaded, as are long stretches of the M11 and the critical access at Junction 8. UDC isn’t responsible for UK National Infrastructure, such as the motorways, railways or in fact any of London’s airports – and so can’t force the airport or other agencies to upgrade them.”
“It is even more concerning for local residents because over the next 15 years UDC is planning for 15,000 new houses in the district. The council wants the majority of these to be around the airport area and feeding into the same roads and railways which already can’t cope. The UDC administration has shown a poor track record of properly considering long-range strategic plans or delivering significant infrastructure. Their costly Local Plan was rejected and the new one has been delayed time after time; they failed to even complete a single-carriageway bypass around Dunmow for 10 years; and they’ve had a string of major planning failures in Dunmow, Elsenham and Saffron Walden. And they certainly don’t have the staff or expertise to properly assess UK National Infrastructure such as airports, rail, and motorway capacity because it’s not their job.”
“Any decision about a major airport expansion such as this is of national significance because there would be a major impact to roads, railways, local communities, noise and the environment. It requires the scrutiny and independence that only a Public Inquiry can give. Heathrow and Gatwick residents have had theirs, so why not here? To make sure of the best outcome for local people, Residents for Uttlesford has written to both the Secretaries of State for Local Government and Transport, and to local MP Kemi Badenoch to urge for a Public Inquiry. This is the first big test for our new MP on local matters, so people will be watching carefully to see if she can deliver.”
“In the meantime, MAG has submitted a planning application for the expansion to UDC to consider. We strongly recommend that residents respond to the public consultation.”
UDC has extended the public consultation until 30th April 2018. Residents can respond on the UDC website.
About Residents for Uttlesford
Residents for Uttlesford (R4U) is the local independent party of north-west Essex towns and villages. Formed in 2014 by a number of residents’ groups, the party believes that on local issues residents should decide, not Westminster parties. R4U’s success has been based on the desire to give local people a voice and implement long range strategic and sustainable plans for their area.
R4U leads Uttlesford District Council (UDC). In its first election in 2015 it became the second party at UDC. In the May 2019 R4U gained majority control of UDC winning two-thirds of the seats. The result delivered the biggest loss of seats by any UK Conservative controlled council in the UK. In 2021 the party won half the Essex County Council seats in Uttlesford district.
R4U also leads Saffron Walden Town Council, where under its stewardship the council has rebuilt finances, invested in community assets, and won multiple awards, including the best run council in Essex. It is a minority party on Great Dunmow Town Council.
Residents for Uttlesford can be found on the web at www.residents4u.org.