Press Release: Residents for Uttlesford strengthens call for new settlement solution to satisfy housing need

6th October 2015, Uttlesford: Residents for Uttlesford (R4U), the local advocacy group for towns and villages, has renewed its calls on Uttlesford District Council (UDC) to adopt the ‘most sustainable’ new settlement option in light of the Council’s report that Uttlesford needs 12,500 new homes to be built.

Dan Starr spokesperson for R4U said “The Uttlesford District Council leadership is focused on the £100 million the government will directly pay it for allowing these houses, but let’s put it into context. 12,500 new homes is an astonishing 40% increase in the number of households in the district. It will generate 32,000 new residents, 20,000 new cars, and 7,800 new school pupils.”

 

Dan Starr continued “Our towns and villages can’t take the scale of development that UDC demands. Existing schools and doctors’ surgeries are already full, sewers are bursting, roads are regularly jammed, and we have illegal air pollution. Residents just can’t understand why the UDC administration still seem intent on allowing large scale development bolted on to our existing towns and villages – even though a number of these sites have already been rejected by the Planning Inspectorate as being unsuitable. “

Dan Starr concluded “We have pushed for an evidence-led process and the evidence is clear: new settlements near to road and rail are the most sustainable. They are also the most beneficial as developers have to pay for all of the necessary infrastructure. It is these sites that must be brought forward for public consultation, not our bursting towns and villages.“

In its report UDC calculates that 12,500 new homes are needed as part of the remedial action that the Planning Inspectorate called for when it rejected the UDC Cabinet’s draft Uttlesford Local Plan in December 2014. The report also shows that the Council needs to allow the approvals of new houses at a rate of 568 per year for at least the next 18 years. Previously in 2011 the Council determined it needed to provide 40% fewer (338 pa), but constant delays by the Council in delivering the Local Plan has meant that the number has kept increasing.

About Residents for Uttlesford

Residents for Uttlesford (R4U) is the local party of towns and villages. The party was formed by a number of residents’ groups in north Essex to provide a strong, independent voice for the views of the residents of the area. The party believes that on local issues locals should decide, not the Westminster party whip.

Uttlesford residents achieved substantial election gains in May 2015. Election successes were based on the group’s localism advocacy platform and the desire to create and implement long range strategic and sustainable plans for their area.

Residents for Uttlesford has 11 Uttlesford District Councillors and many Town and Parish Councillors. It is the Second Party at Uttlesford District Council and the first party at Saffron Walden Town Council.

Residents for Uttlesford can be found on the web at www.residents4u.org. Also available on the website are latest News,  councillor bios and blogs.

One thought on “Press Release: Residents for Uttlesford strengthens call for new settlement solution to satisfy housing need

  1. keithmackmanKeith

    The most important point that has to be driven home is that currently UDC are deliberately ignoring the planning inspector. It was made abundantly clear in his decision notice that a dispersal policy is not practical, given the nature of existing settlements. He was particularly scathing about the Elsenham proposal which was at the core of the rejected draft local plan.

    Therefore it is obvious that the solution has to be considered in relation to a large new single settlement yet UDC have refused to do this. It is depressing to note that the Uttlesford cabinet members exerting so much influence on the draft plan (and the aborted previous failure) have no experience in planning. Given the mulish refusal to recognise the clear guidance given by the inspector it is obvious that the new plan will be similarly rejected.

    Reply

Leave a Reply